| 1 |
08.05.2017 21:55, Andreas K. Huettel пишет: |
| 2 |
> Am Montag, 8. Mai 2017, 12:49:32 CEST schrieb Mikle Kolyada: |
| 3 |
>> Against. Do not touch things you are not working on, council has already |
| 4 |
>> dropped m68k s390 and sh to exp few years ago. Now we have a big mess |
| 5 |
>> there and only, while ia64 sparc and co have slow but progress and |
| 6 |
>> mature enough stable profiles. |
| 7 |
> No objections against having many arches, but: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If an arch is keyworded / stable on more packages than that team can |
| 10 |
> reasonably take care of, that needs to be corrected somehow. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The easiest solution is for the arch team to remove keywords until they have a |
| 13 |
> reasonable response time again. And if the arch team doesn't do that by |
| 14 |
> itself, well, ... |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Having one-man teams block everybody else hurts Gentoo as a whole. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
We have appropriate hardware if people wanna do the work, jut go & make |
| 19 |
things better :), I do not think someone from existing arch teams has |
| 20 |
something against that |
Archives