| 1 |
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 22:08 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 2 |
> We have appropriate hardware if people wanna do the work, jut go & |
| 3 |
> make |
| 4 |
> things better :), I do not think someone from existing arch teams has |
| 5 |
> something against that |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Ok so let me get the logic right: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
1) Arch teams can add their keywords to ebuilds in general, without the |
| 10 |
maintainer having a say in that. |
| 11 |
2) Arch team goes MIA because <reasons/>. |
| 12 |
3) Now the maintainer has to chase down machines and do KEYWORDREQ |
| 13 |
testing on other arches because we cannot admit that some archs are not |
| 14 |
maintained. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Please confirm the above logic. If that logic is about right, I am |
| 17 |
sorry, but I disagree. I will rather dekeyword unmaintained archs. I am |
| 18 |
not going to babysit arch teams in doing their work for them. |
Archives