| 1 |
08.05.2017 22:21, David Seifert пишет: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 22:08 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 3 |
>> We have appropriate hardware if people wanna do the work, jut go & |
| 4 |
>> make |
| 5 |
>> things better :), I do not think someone from existing arch teams has |
| 6 |
>> something against that |
| 7 |
> Ok so let me get the logic right: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> 1) Arch teams can add their keywords to ebuilds in general, without the |
| 10 |
> maintainer having a say in that. |
| 11 |
> 2) Arch team goes MIA because <reasons/>. |
| 12 |
> 3) Now the maintainer has to chase down machines and do KEYWORDREQ |
| 13 |
> testing on other arches because we cannot admit that some archs are not |
| 14 |
> maintained. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Please confirm the above logic. If that logic is about right, I am |
| 17 |
> sorry, but I disagree. I will rather dekeyword unmaintained archs. I am |
| 18 |
> not going to babysit arch teams in doing their work for them. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
To clarify: |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I have not seen the draft of proper reverting these arches to exp or |
| 23 |
dev, if it will be like sh or s390, better kill the horse like debian |
| 24 |
did to alpha and hppa, without riding it. |
Archives