1 |
Moritz Schulte [moritz@×××××××××××××××.de] wrote: |
2 |
> Mark Bainter <mark-gt@×××××.org> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I think it really has little to do with giving credit for that |
5 |
> > development to the developers. That's already done. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Well, it is done, because there are people out there who mention that |
8 |
> GNU is such an important piece of the whole operating system. If no |
9 |
> one would mention GNU and it would be only the "Linux system" - this |
10 |
> wouldn't seem like much credit to the GNU people to me. |
11 |
|
12 |
It is done because names/info is right there in the documentation |
13 |
and man pages. Same as every other tool and application. |
14 |
|
15 |
> > To think that they are or were somehow critically important to this |
16 |
> > movement is incredibly foolish. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Really? I am not so sure wether the Free Software movement would |
19 |
> exist nowadays without the FSF and the GNU Project. |
20 |
|
21 |
You are certainly entitled to your opinion. However, remember that |
22 |
nature abhors a vacuum. In my opinion, it would've simply been a |
23 |
matter of time before someone else did it. This doesn't mean those |
24 |
who worked hard to bring us what we have today don't deserve our |
25 |
thanks or credit for what they did, but it DOES mean they shouldn't |
26 |
get a big head and act like the whole movement hinge(s|d) on their |
27 |
existence. It doesn't. |