1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 04/17/2015 01:00 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
5 |
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:33:06 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
6 |
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> On 15/04/15 15:02, Peter Stuge wrote: |
9 |
>>> the threshold to become a developer with write access to the |
10 |
>>> gentoo repo is very high |
11 |
>> LOL. No. It's way too low, given our review-less workflow in |
12 |
>> which any dev can do essentially whatever they want. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The only net results from strict review workflow (when each commit |
15 |
> of each dev must be reviewed and approved by at least N devs) are |
16 |
|
17 |
Agreed, although to be fair, without putting words in Alexander's |
18 |
mouth, I believe the original intention was mostly that we should have |
19 |
a high bar to get commit access, as it involve a great deal of trust |
20 |
in the first place, a review process would be a mitigant for this, but |
21 |
as you correctly point out, it simply isn't economical. |
22 |
|
23 |
As have been pointed out, there are other ways to contribute (proxied |
24 |
maintenance, overlay, editing wiki, support etc) that is likely a |
25 |
better starting point than becoming a dev directly. |
26 |
|
27 |
- -- |
28 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
29 |
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
30 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
32 |
|
33 |
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVMOqVAAoJEP7VAChXwav6b0EIAKrSIInhoq7lrpLdHO8HtuVV |
34 |
beCvj+WM6zwIoI1ahuRxvhwGxUVQ/CJShBYgmCl+IjahyUUG+v6Shzl3XoMi73U3 |
35 |
CyNGeTBGqdSl1BM7uo0j1oO3Qh/xWPsz8GvrMoQDqvWiMpo9qy6xyAikf4QrZA71 |
36 |
WXonj/IeYP9KKo3uGgOUIGCB4tsHP6lY+HTN9DGkVwAJWFeNqEPcBhTChrEec+Cv |
37 |
yG9xzcMfxT8ixochMaG1b1A0wVq/hIpMQ2UuIy573QylZ5bwwOy++9leSrR5I5xY |
38 |
rtuusipxROGklSPxsFyFa6GEBwd2stNB03LduxHvaffmJnE4MewLoJ2NuASgytQ= |
39 |
=ZCi4 |
40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |