| 1 |
>>> It depends upon the degree to which one specifies 'sendmail |
| 2 |
>>> compatibility'. Does it mean "shares some of the same commandline |
| 3 |
>>> options" or "shares exactly the same configuration file format and |
| 4 |
>>> all bugs and produces identical output"? |
| 5 |
>> I think Mike mentioned compatiblebinaries. Not sure if he implied |
| 6 |
>> identical output, but compatible command line would be nice. I don't |
| 7 |
>> think it's a huge obstacle for paludis, though. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If it's just an issue of command line, then it's not an issue at all. |
| 10 |
> Even configuration support isn't a major problem (Paludis trunk has |
| 11 |
> highly experimental and highly buggy partial Portage config reading |
| 12 |
> support). The question is whether scripts that, say, parse emerge -pv |
| 13 |
> output have to carry on working. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think this requirement would put portage itself in quite uncomfortable |
| 16 |
situation. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Love, |
| 19 |
H |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives