Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisiting GLEP 19
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:15:50
Message-Id: 200407211915.34093.carlo@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisiting GLEP 19 by Stuart Herbert
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Wednesday 21 July 2004 17:08, Stuart Herbert wrote:
5 >For devs who
6 > really hate using XML, we could always turn echangelog into a simple
7 > form-filling tool to walk people through filling out a changelog entry.
8
9 I implied this. I won't edit such xml files by hand on a regular basis. Even
10 with such a tool it will need quite a bit more time, depending on what you
11 want to put in these xml files. Regarding security vs bugfixes: For security
12 we have glsa-check already and important bugfixes are handled via a marked
13 stable -rX, so I don't see the problem here, beside that there is no
14 extensive information given, which someone would need to write.
15
16 I mean, we are not even able to fix all the metadata.xml files. A lot are
17 simply missing, a lot name retired devs* as maintainer and quite a few list
18 bug-wranglers or no-herd in it. Unless we do not have more developers it is
19 not a good idea to force more overhead on us as necessary.
20
21 *devrel isn't even able to provide a complete list of retired devs
22
23
24 Carsten
25 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
27
28 iD8DBQFA/qS2VwbzmvGLSW8RAmVTAJ4oRql7ab45p0mIE4/pjgZy7CTIXACgjxE+
29 w+pfMbDLPPbfRjRge/3VR10=
30 =LFmP
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list