1 |
Matt Turner wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> hasufell wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: |
5 |
>>>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 |
7 |
>>>>> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
>>>>>> Rich Freeman wrote: |
9 |
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
10 |
>>>>>>>> Then perhaps all this should have been worked out BEFORE switching |
11 |
>>>>>>>> to github? |
12 |
>>>>>>> We didn't switch to github. |
13 |
>>>>>> Then why are people saying to use git to look at the logs? I don't |
14 |
>>>>>> want to use git. |
15 |
>>>>> git != github... |
16 |
>>>>> |
17 |
>>>>>> I liked being able to go to the tree and look at the |
18 |
>>>>>> change logs when I needed to which is sometimes often. |
19 |
>>>>> I think you have a technology comprehension problem here, rather than a |
20 |
>>>>> technology problem. The problem is your workflow, not the tools. |
21 |
>>>>> |
22 |
>>>> What I understand is this. The logs since github started being used are |
23 |
>>>> no longer updated like they used to be. I realize that git is a command |
24 |
>>>> but it seems that git gets its info from github since the logs are no |
25 |
>>>> longer downloaded when I sync the tree. |
26 |
>>> No. You should really read some tutorials/introductions on git to |
27 |
>>> understand how it works and this ML isn't the place for that. It's not |
28 |
>>> like SVN, so you don't even need an internet connection for the tree to |
29 |
>>> work (e.g. if you've copied it via USB even). Github is totally |
30 |
>>> unrelated here. |
31 |
>>> |
32 |
>>> |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> So you are telling me that people using github and the switch that took |
35 |
>> place has absolutely nothing to do with the changelogs going dead? |
36 |
> You keep saying GitHub. Github is not relevant to this discussion. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Yes, the ChangeLogs stopped being updated because of git. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively |
41 |
> improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per |
42 |
> month: https://www.openhub.net/p/gentoo |
43 |
> |
44 |
> It was decided that the missing infrastructure for ChangeLogs was not |
45 |
> a sufficient reason to block a hugely important change. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> People care about finishing this, as evidence by this thread. Please |
48 |
> stop complaining. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
What bothers me is that people make it sound like it is ONLY me that is |
54 |
having this issue when I have seen it posted here and on -user as well |
55 |
by others. I agree that the change has improved things because even tho |
56 |
I don't update as often as some do, I see more updates. I'm not arguing |
57 |
that point for sure. Even I can see that improvement. I just ask that |
58 |
people not point at me like it is only me that has a problem when even |
59 |
Robin replied that the problem is known about and some changes seem to |
60 |
be coming, hopefully soon since I miss the changelogs. |
61 |
|
62 |
I also find it odd that early on, I was told to go to the github website |
63 |
to get info regarding changes to Gentoo packages. I even bookmarked the |
64 |
link. Even package.gentoo.org was out of date for a while. Thing is, |
65 |
that doesn't match what I have locally because that includes changes |
66 |
made since my last sync. It's not easy to find out what applies to me |
67 |
locally since they are not in sync. Having it in the tree like it once |
68 |
was means they are synced at the same time and the info there matches |
69 |
what is in the tree locally because they get updated together. |
70 |
|
71 |
As it is, if it is being worked on, fine. Just don't tell me that I'm |
72 |
the only one with outdated changelogs and that I don't know the |
73 |
difference between a software package and a website. I've been to |
74 |
gituhub, as I was told to, and I know about the git software package |
75 |
too. I just prefer not to use the website and would like up to date |
76 |
logs locally like it should be and it appears from Robins reply is being |
77 |
worked on at some point. It just seems they want to finish something |
78 |
else first. |
79 |
|
80 |
Dale |
81 |
|
82 |
:-) :-) |