Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42) | ||
| Date: | Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:34:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4CA5FF67.40402@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42) by Nirbheek Chauhan |
||
| 1 | On 10/01/2010 08:13 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 2 | > Does lafilefixer fix binpkgs now? As well as the vdb manifests for the |
| 3 | > files? If it doesn't, I strongly object to having it as an official |
| 4 | > recommendation. A surprisingly large no. of people (at least on |
| 5 | > bugzilla) have FEATURES=buildpkg . |
| 6 | |
| 7 | It works if you run it on $D in post_src_install like the news item |
| 8 | recommends. The binary package is created from $D after that. |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Thanks, |
| 11 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42) | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> |