1 |
2018-03-27 18:39 GMT+02:00 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
> > Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
6 |
> >>> |
7 |
> >>> It is about openness vs. isolation. |
8 |
> >> |
9 |
> >> I'm pretty sure most developers, myself included, want to welcome |
10 |
> >> contributions. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Closing of the mailing list does not sound like that. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Sure, but it is actually part of the motivation. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Consider this scenario. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Fred is a community member. Fred consistently harasses and trolls new |
20 |
> contributors in private. New contributors end up leaving because of |
21 |
> Fred. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
> Fred gets booted out as a result. No mention is made of why Fred as |
25 |
> booted out, because everything happened in private. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
And how this work on forums? Do moderators have the ability to ban Fred |
29 |
for his harrasments on private channels? |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
> |
33 |
> Now a bunch of community members get upset about Fred being booted out |
34 |
> without reason. Fred claims it is because he disagrees with the |
35 |
> leadership on something. People start arguing endlessly about |
36 |
> openness. |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
Very same efect you will get when Fred is whitelisted by a developer, and |
40 |
kicked out when he starts acting inappriopriate. Please kindly show me the |
41 |
difference. |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
> |
45 |
> Ultimately the leaders just want Fred gone so that new contributors |
46 |
> aren't getting driven away. They can't explain that because then they |
47 |
> create potential civil liability for the project. The problem is that |
48 |
> the debate goes on for over a year despite intervening elections and |
49 |
> now this becomes the issue that is driving new contributors away. |
50 |
> |
51 |
|
52 |
Please explain. I can imagine a troll on some #gentoo-${ISO3166-1_alpha-2} |
53 |
who |
54 |
is banned by channel operator. Does this create potential civil liability |
55 |
for the project? |
56 |
|
57 |
|
58 |
> |
59 |
> What solution would you propose for this problem? It isn't |
60 |
> hypothetical at all - I can think of one case in Gentoo's past where |
61 |
> this happened that I'm aware of, and I'd be shocked if it were the |
62 |
> only one. |
63 |
> |
64 |
|
65 |
Saying as an ex-dev and community member by last 12 years - banning trolls |
66 |
and explaining reasons to others is always better solution. |
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
> |
70 |
> > And anyway, you can be sure that the problem will appear again, |
71 |
> > no matter how closed the list will be. |
72 |
> |
73 |
> Sure, but we can at least force the negative advertising of Gentoo to |
74 |
> go elsewhere, rather than basically paying to run a negative PR |
75 |
> campaign against ourselves. |
76 |
> |
77 |
> >> A lot of this comes down to considering that most people in these |
78 |
> >> debates probably are well-intended. |
79 |
> > |
80 |
> > Taking away freedom is never justified by good intention. |
81 |
> |
82 |
> You might want to choose a BSD-based distro then. :) |
83 |
> |
84 |
> And what about the freedom to endlessly troll and harass you and |
85 |
> others? Is this truly a freedom we want to stand for? How about the |
86 |
> freedom to harass members of legally-protected classes (something that |
87 |
> also has happened historically in the community)? |
88 |
> |
89 |
|
90 |
Trolls are trolls, and when banned/blacklisted by default THEN, they will |
91 |
start |
92 |
their trolling on private channels. |
93 |
|
94 |
|
95 |
> |
96 |
> Surely Gentoo's mission isn't to run completely unrestricated forums |
97 |
> for discussion of anything and everything. Our main purpose here is |
98 |
> to maintain a Linux distro, not provide a platform for anybody who has |
99 |
> an opinion on anything. Free expression has to be balanced against |
100 |
> the interests of people who want to actually contribute to the distro |
101 |
> without being endlessly trolled and harassed. |
102 |
> |
103 |
> -- |
104 |
> Rich |
105 |
> |
106 |
> |
107 |
|
108 |
|
109 |
-- |
110 |
Pozdrawiam |
111 |
Dawid Węgliński |