1 |
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:14:49 -0500 |
2 |
Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I face funroll-loops references and worse almost every time I bring up |
5 |
> Gentoo among a different group of Linux-familiar technical people. |
6 |
> There are still *very* strong prejudices against Gentoo in most places |
7 |
|
8 |
Comparing Gentoo to "binary" Linux distros is simply using the wrong |
9 |
analogy. I use Gentoo/Linux the way other people use some BSD with |
10 |
ports - this is where Gentoo stands out, and compiler flags have little |
11 |
to do with it. Build time configuration does. You pick a development |
12 |
base, build and install packages you want on top of that, and you end |
13 |
up running a stable system for years that is relatively easy to patch |
14 |
up as and when needed. |
15 |
|
16 |
The difference between many other ports-like distros and Gentoo is that |
17 |
it is usually very well possible to do rolling upgrades and we make |
18 |
that difference by ensuring a neverending progression from unstable to |
19 |
stable, instead of calling a freeze every so often and picking up new |
20 |
developments for future "stable" releases. |
21 |
|
22 |
> I've brought it up. But when I bring it up, and I argue against those |
23 |
> funroll-loops references, one or two people come out of lurking and |
24 |
> admit that they use it...and it's a surprise to people around them. |
25 |
|
26 |
There you go! Just explain that compiler optimisation is not the reason |
27 |
you use it. Then you should have their attention and you can start to |
28 |
explain the actual reasons you use it. It may make them feel rather |
29 |
stupid about the "plonk in the CD and roll with it" attitude that they |
30 |
must have picked up from some antiquated locked-down distro[1]. :) |
31 |
|
32 |
> I've started describing it as a "coming out of the closet" experience |
33 |
> for a reason... There's a _serious_ reputation issue that Gentoo still |
34 |
> hasn't completely sloughed off...which is incredibly sad. |
35 |
|
36 |
The same reputation issue that FreeBSD and OpenBSD have, no doubt. |
37 |
|
38 |
> :wq |
39 |
|
40 |
There is an app for that: |
41 |
alias :wq='echo "OK, I quit!"' |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
jer |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
[1] Heck, nowadays even Windows and Mac OS X support several ports-like |
48 |
source-based software distros, despite sandboxed, walled-gardened |
49 |
"app stores" for people who find it easier to pay for stuff than to |
50 |
wonder how to get the software they need for free. And that's |
51 |
entirely fair: it's a design/implementation decision everyone has |
52 |
to make according to their own needs, expectations, limitations and |
53 |
experience. |