1 |
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use |
4 |
>> some of that bug bounty money to fix up the recruitment documentation |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Recruitment documentatiob? What does that mean? |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> People still think of Gentoo as a ricer distro that's broken all |
9 |
>> the time, when in reality, it's one of the most stable. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Well that's not entirely true but that's a different issue |
12 |
|
13 |
What's not really true? That it's the most stable? or that people |
14 |
think of it as a ricer distro? |
15 |
|
16 |
I face funroll-loops references and worse almost every time I bring up |
17 |
Gentoo among a different group of Linux-familiar technical people. |
18 |
There are still *very* strong prejudices against Gentoo in most places |
19 |
I've brought it up. But when I bring it up, and I argue against those |
20 |
funroll-loops references, one or two people come out of lurking and |
21 |
admit that they use it...and it's a surprise to people around them. |
22 |
|
23 |
I've started describing it as a "coming out of the closet" experience |
24 |
for a reason... There's a _serious_ reputation issue that Gentoo still |
25 |
hasn't completely sloughed off...which is incredibly sad. Of all the |
26 |
distros I've used, I've come to the conclusion that Gentoo is the |
27 |
easily nicest for almost anyone even moderately technical. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
:wq |