1 |
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use |
5 |
>>> some of that bug bounty money to fix up the recruitment documentation |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Recruitment documentatiob? What does that mean? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>> People still think of Gentoo as a ricer distro that's broken all |
10 |
>>> the time, when in reality, it's one of the most stable. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Well that's not entirely true but that's a different issue |
13 |
> |
14 |
> What's not really true? That it's the most stable? or that people |
15 |
> think of it as a ricer distro? |
16 |
|
17 |
Its a rolling distro; compared to static release distros (Ubuntu LTS, |
18 |
Debian Stable) it is not even close to the most stable because it |
19 |
changes frequently. |
20 |
|
21 |
> |
22 |
> I face funroll-loops references and worse almost every time I bring up |
23 |
> Gentoo among a different group of Linux-familiar technical people. |
24 |
> There are still *very* strong prejudices against Gentoo in most places |
25 |
> I've brought it up. But when I bring it up, and I argue against those |
26 |
> funroll-loops references, one or two people come out of lurking and |
27 |
> admit that they use it...and it's a surprise to people around them. |
28 |
|
29 |
I've encountered different anecdotes; but in the end that is all they |
30 |
are. Many technical people I encounter say they used Gentoo at one |
31 |
time or another, learned a lot, then moved on to new things. |
32 |
|
33 |
> |
34 |
> I've started describing it as a "coming out of the closet" experience |
35 |
> for a reason... There's a _serious_ reputation issue that Gentoo still |
36 |
> hasn't completely sloughed off...which is incredibly sad. Of all the |
37 |
> distros I've used, I've come to the conclusion that Gentoo is the |
38 |
> easily nicest for almost anyone even moderately technical. |
39 |
|
40 |
At least in the working world, most technical people just want to get |
41 |
things done; Linux is just one tool in their toolbox for doing this. |
42 |
Most of them don't want to spent time messing with their distro; they |
43 |
just want things to work out of the box, configured the way they like |
44 |
(and I don't mean USE flags in this context, I mean the UI.) |
45 |
|
46 |
> |
47 |
> -- |
48 |
> :wq |
49 |
> |