| 1 |
Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> And? Two wrongs don't make a right. |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > What do you mean by "And?" - it doesn't make much sense as a reply. :\ |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> He means that none of those provide justification. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It seemed that the main argument was that there are too few packages |
| 9 |
and then then I do think that other categories with few(er!) packages |
| 10 |
provide lots of justification. But in any case I too feel that number |
| 11 |
of packages is secondary to "what makes sense" AKA "a correct model".. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Are you being intentionally obtuse? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Why would I? I'm making an effort to understand what was intended |
| 17 |
to be communicated, because what was actually communicated makes |
| 18 |
no sense to me. :\ |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
//Peter |
Archives