| 1 |
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 11:24, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:43 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | A GLEP should list whom has been solicited and provide evidence that |
| 6 |
> | each has given their explicit approval of the GLEP. A GLEP without |
| 7 |
> | explicit approval of all teams involved cannot receive managerial |
| 8 |
> | approval. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP saying |
| 11 |
> "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure said |
| 12 |
> documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group were in |
| 13 |
> favour, and the developer community in general were in favour, and the |
| 14 |
> council were in favour, and the people proposed by the GLEP to manage |
| 15 |
> the new documentation were in favour, but the existing owners of the |
| 16 |
> developer documentation were not, you're saying that it shouldn't be |
| 17 |
> approved? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yes. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives