| 1 |
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:39:49 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| > So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP |
| 4 |
| > saying "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure |
| 5 |
| > said documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group |
| 6 |
| > were in favour, and the developer community in general were in |
| 7 |
| > favour, and the council were in favour, and the people proposed by |
| 8 |
| > the GLEP to manage the new documentation were in favour, but the |
| 9 |
| > existing owners of the developer documentation were not, you're |
| 10 |
| > saying that it shouldn't be approved? |
| 11 |
| |
| 12 |
| Yes. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Unworkable. Your proposal would allow a small group of obstinate |
| 15 |
developers to hold back progress. The problem here is that the council |
| 16 |
isn't acting as a decent last line of quality control when the GLEP |
| 17 |
authors fail to do their jobs properly. Your GLEP is trying to solve |
| 18 |
the wrong thing... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) |
| 22 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 23 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives