| 1 |
On 4/24/05, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Since keywording policy seems to be being ignored again... Don't *ever* |
| 3 |
> commit new ebuild revisions straight to stable, even if you think it's a |
| 4 |
> trivial fix. There are plenty of things that could go wrong even with |
| 5 |
> simple patches -- for example, if you accidentally included some CVS Id: |
| 6 |
> lines in your patch, they'll get nuked when you do the commit. And, if |
| 7 |
> you commit straight to stable, you end up breaking arch rather than just |
| 8 |
> ~arch. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Why not have a three strike rule - anyone who commits something |
| 11 |
straight to stable 3 times in a given period (say 6 months) has their |
| 12 |
CVS access revoked. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Paul |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Rogue Tory |
| 18 |
www.roguetory.org.uk |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives