Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: foser <foser@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Committing straight to stable
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:58:51
Message-Id: 1114376354.1790.6.camel@rivendell
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Committing straight to stable by Paul Waring
1 On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 21:29 +0100, Paul Waring wrote:
2 > Why not have a three strike rule - anyone who commits something
3 > straight to stable 3 times in a given period (say 6 months) has their
4 > CVS access revoked.
5
6 It's not California here. You completely ignore the fact that some
7 people commit more than others and as such are more likely to trip over
8 such a rule anyway and the people who do commit a lot are usually the
9 same people you don't want to revoke the access from.
10
11 It's just a reminder, don't make up some unenforceable policy just
12 because people make mistakes from time to time.
13
14 1 strike, you are out.
15
16 - foser

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Committing straight to stable Paul Waring <pwaring@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Committing straight to stable Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>