| 1 |
On 4/24/05, foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> It's not California here. You completely ignore the fact that some |
| 3 |
> people commit more than others and as such are more likely to trip over |
| 4 |
> such a rule anyway and the people who do commit a lot are usually the |
| 5 |
> same people you don't want to revoke the access from. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
It was only a suggestion - you could have it so that anyone who trips |
| 8 |
up iin more than X% of commits gets access revoked, or reduced, or |
| 9 |
whatever. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> 1 strike, you are out. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Oh I see, a user can't make one suggestion as to a policy to deal with |
| 14 |
a problem but a dev can make as many mistakes as they like which cause |
| 15 |
systems to break. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paul |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rogue Tory |
| 21 |
www.roguetory.org.uk |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives