| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 6 May 2007 22:50:40 +0200 |
| 3 |
> expose@×××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 4 |
>> It might be infinitely more, yet it still isnt worth anything for the |
| 5 |
>> reasons already explained which you, I guess, have accidently |
| 6 |
>> overlooked again. I bet your users wont like reading zillions of - |
| 7 |
>> for gods sake - very very trivial news items for each and every |
| 8 |
>> package that hits the tree or they upgrade or what so ever else. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> And they won't get zillions. Read the thread. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Sure they will gets zillions of them if everyone starts abusing this |
| 13 |
feature the same way as you suggest. Imagine an average install w/ ~700 |
| 14 |
packages notifying users about config file changes and similar stuff. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
>> And if your expierence shows they will do like this, just write all |
| 17 |
>> the news items, and put them up your own repository, at let your |
| 18 |
>> happy users read them from there. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Also already been covered. Read the thread. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Haven't noticed either, maybe you could point us to where has this been |
| 23 |
covered? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Jakub Moc |
| 30 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 31 |
GPG signature: |
| 32 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 33 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives