1 |
El mar, 10-01-2012 a las 12:39 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
2 |
> On 01/09/2012 10:04 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
3 |
> > 2012/1/9 Samuli Suominen<ssuominen@g.o>: |
4 |
> >> # Samuli Suominen<ssuominen@g.o> (09 Jan 2012) |
5 |
> >> # Fails to compile against recent glibc and multiple other issues. |
6 |
> >> # No maintainer to take care of the package. Removal in 30 days. |
7 |
> >> # Bugs 325331, 284369, 380749, 388741, 381539, 358697, and 332395. |
8 |
> >> sys-fs/zfs-fuse |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > this is un-fortunate, it would be possible to replace it with the zfs |
11 |
> > module, there are ebuilds in some overlay for the couple sys-devel/spl |
12 |
> > + sys-fs/zfs which work well with some adjustment up to kernel 3.1.8. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > For example "pinkbyte" overlay (mentioned @ |
15 |
> > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/ZFS) has good version of them, the only |
16 |
> > changes needed where: |
17 |
> > 1)<= automake to 1.10 |
18 |
> > 2) - --with-linux-obj="${KERNEL_DIR}" |
19 |
> > + --with-linux-obj="${KBUILD_OUTPUT}" |
20 |
> > 3) maybe spl should register for "module-rebuild" but it does not (not sure) |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I support the idea of someone rescuing this. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Fact is that it has been on life support since 2008 when the original |
26 |
> zfs-fuse maintainer stopped caring about the package. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> So anyone: Feel free. I'm not going to fix it anymore. Already did that |
29 |
> for couple of years. Not using or testing it anymore. Simply no time. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Francesco, maybe you could contact |
34 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/proxy-maintainers/ :-/ |