| 1 |
On 01/09/2012 10:04 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2012/1/9 Samuli Suominen<ssuominen@g.o>: |
| 3 |
>> # Samuli Suominen<ssuominen@g.o> (09 Jan 2012) |
| 4 |
>> # Fails to compile against recent glibc and multiple other issues. |
| 5 |
>> # No maintainer to take care of the package. Removal in 30 days. |
| 6 |
>> # Bugs 325331, 284369, 380749, 388741, 381539, 358697, and 332395. |
| 7 |
>> sys-fs/zfs-fuse |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> this is un-fortunate, it would be possible to replace it with the zfs |
| 10 |
> module, there are ebuilds in some overlay for the couple sys-devel/spl |
| 11 |
> + sys-fs/zfs which work well with some adjustment up to kernel 3.1.8. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> For example "pinkbyte" overlay (mentioned @ |
| 14 |
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/ZFS) has good version of them, the only |
| 15 |
> changes needed where: |
| 16 |
> 1)<= automake to 1.10 |
| 17 |
> 2) - --with-linux-obj="${KERNEL_DIR}" |
| 18 |
> + --with-linux-obj="${KBUILD_OUTPUT}" |
| 19 |
> 3) maybe spl should register for "module-rebuild" but it does not (not sure) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I support the idea of someone rescuing this. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Fact is that it has been on life support since 2008 when the original |
| 25 |
zfs-fuse maintainer stopped caring about the package. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
So anyone: Feel free. I'm not going to fix it anymore. Already did that |
| 28 |
for couple of years. Not using or testing it anymore. Simply no time. |
Archives