| 1 |
On 09/19/2016 09:51 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/14/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:45:58 -0400 |
| 4 |
>> Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
.. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> Why are those ebuilds not live? If upstream doesn't do real releases and |
| 10 |
> can't even be bothered to tag the commit that marks a release, then why |
| 11 |
> are you (or someone else) doing all this work? The snapshot scripts |
| 12 |
> could be replaced by a live ebuild and upstream can handle bugs as they |
| 13 |
> come since they can't be bothered to version their software. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I would expect because live ebuilds can't be keyworded, so snapshot is |
| 16 |
the correct way to do it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
That said; I'm not sure if it makes sense to include this sort of |
| 19 |
scripts in the Gentoo tree instead of a separate git repo e.g for the |
| 20 |
project. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 24 |
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 25 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives