Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making revdep-rebuild (partially) obsolete
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 05:47:48
Message-Id: 201101020046.32729.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] making revdep-rebuild (partially) obsolete by Zac Medico
1 On Sunday, January 02, 2011 00:17:03 Zac Medico wrote:
2 > On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
3 > > Well, I'm still using portage-2.1, so I wans't aware of whats going
4 > > on there. For now it seems the preservation is still done explicitly
5 > > (preserve_old_lib calls in certain ebuilds ?). My proposal is to
6 > > record the necessary information (eg. which so some executable/so
7 > > is linked against) automatically - does portage-2.2 do that ?
8 >
9 > Yes, portage-2.2 uses /var/db/pkg/*/*/NEEDED.ELF.3 for that.
10
11 although portage has long been generating the NEEDED files in vdb. even
12 stable portage generates these files.
13 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] making revdep-rebuild (partially) obsolete Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>