Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] making revdep-rebuild (partially) obsolete | ||
| Date: | Sun, 02 Jan 2011 05:17:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4D200A4F.3040803@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] making revdep-rebuild (partially) obsolete by Enrico Weigelt |
||
| 1 | On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
| 2 | > Well, I'm still using portage-2.1, so I wans't aware of whats going |
| 3 | > on there. For now it seems the preservation is still done explicitly |
| 4 | > (preserve_old_lib calls in certain ebuilds ?). My proposal is to |
| 5 | > record the necessary information (eg. which so some executable/so |
| 6 | > is linked against) automatically - does portage-2.2 do that ? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Yes, portage-2.2 uses /var/db/pkg/*/*/NEEDED.ELF.3 for that. |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Thanks, |
| 11 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] making revdep-rebuild (partially) obsolete | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |