| 1 |
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:41:02 -0600 |
| 3 |
> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > All, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > as part of bug 599044 [1], I have created a tmpfiles project which is a |
| 8 |
> > standalone utility to handle systemd style tmpfiles.d files. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > There is currently a live ebuild in the tree, but I haven't done any |
| 11 |
> > releases yet. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Take a look at it, and anything about it is open for discussion at this |
| 14 |
> > point. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > The name is a bit vague, but honestly I couldn't figure out a better |
| 17 |
> > name. I don't really want openrc in the name, because this is meant to |
| 18 |
> > be more generic than that; it is not meant to require OpenRC to run. |
| 19 |
> > OpenRC will use it, but not the other way around. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> opentmpfiles? tmprc? :-D |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Hmm, I don't know if you are being serious or just messing with me, but |
| 24 |
if you are being serious I'll consider opentmpfiles. In a way that makes |
| 25 |
sense because of openrc/openresolv/opentmpfiles. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If there are no objections I'll rename it. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
William |
Archives