1 |
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:41:02 -0600 |
2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> All, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> as part of bug 599044 [1], I have created a tmpfiles project which is a |
7 |
> standalone utility to handle systemd style tmpfiles.d files. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> There is currently a live ebuild in the tree, but I haven't done any |
10 |
> releases yet. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Take a look at it, and anything about it is open for discussion at this |
13 |
> point. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> The name is a bit vague, but honestly I couldn't figure out a better |
16 |
> name. I don't really want openrc in the name, because this is meant to |
17 |
> be more generic than that; it is not meant to require OpenRC to run. |
18 |
> OpenRC will use it, but not the other way around. |
19 |
|
20 |
opentmpfiles? tmprc? :-D |
21 |
|
22 |
> If you see any bugs, now is also the time to let me know before any |
23 |
> releases are out. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> The plan, once the first release is out, is to rewrite this utility in a |
26 |
> better language. I'm considering C, but if I am comfortable by that time |
27 |
> in Go or Rust, I may use one of them. |
28 |
|
29 |
Sounds like a good way to lose 95% [1] of users. |
30 |
|
31 |
[1]: Note: it's just a random approximation. It may be underestimated. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Michał Górny |
36 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |