| 1 |
hi aaron, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2001 09:02 schrieben Sie: |
| 4 |
> I have question/suggestion. Is it really necessary to put mozilla, |
| 5 |
> gnome and others in /opt? I know it keeps it a bit more organzed and |
| 6 |
> such, but it really makes it a pain when compiling things. Some |
| 7 |
> programs, despite what they're told to use via the configure script |
| 8 |
> insist on using includes from /usr/include instead of |
| 9 |
> /opt/gnome/include. If not changing it, at least provide sympolic |
| 10 |
> links or something (ie ln -s /usr/gnome/include/* /usr/include/ ). I |
| 11 |
> think it would solve quite a few problems. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
if i remember correctly does the Linux Standard Base define to put |
| 15 |
gnome, kde etc in /opt - so your "things" configure scripts/Makefiles |
| 16 |
should be adjusted to look there too/first. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> -Aaron |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
greetings |
| 21 |
Thilo |
Archives