| 1 |
On 01/08/13 04:03, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
>> As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to |
| 4 |
>> go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as |
| 5 |
>> static builds. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Robin, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'm curious what the use case for keeping them as static builds is? I |
| 10 |
> would rather see that support dropped as well. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Udev and kmod upstream do not support static builds so I want |
| 13 |
> to drop that support from our ebuilds. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I started fixing that in kmod and got something else more pressing to |
| 16 |
do, today I'll spend the whole day trying to get that in shape. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Help welcome obviously. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
As said before using correct C namespacing isn't rocket science. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
(obviously when you start seeing unchecked mallocs and reallocs in |
| 23 |
library code you might shiver a bit... but that can be fixed later as well) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
lu |
Archives