From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> | ||
Cc: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o, udev-bugs@g.o, systemd <systemd@g.o>, base-system <base-system@g.o>, cardoe@g.o, agk@××××××.com | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2 | ||
Date: | Thu, 01 Aug 2013 02:03:33 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130801020316.GA29968@linux1 | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2 by "Robin H. Johnson" |
1 | On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 | > As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to |
3 | > go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as |
4 | > static builds. |
5 | |
6 | Robin, |
7 | |
8 | I'm curious what the use case for keeping them as static builds is? I |
9 | would rather see that support dropped as well. |
10 | |
11 | Udev and kmod upstream do not support static builds so I want |
12 | to drop that support from our ebuilds. |
13 | |
14 | Thanks, |
15 | |
16 | William |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2 | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2 | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |