1 |
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 06:00 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:39:05AM -0500 or thereabouts, Alec Warner wrote: |
3 |
> > I think some people have attempted things that are interesting or |
4 |
> > innovative, although they may not have gotten off of the ground quite |
5 |
> > yet. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> That's the problem. Lots of folks have great ideas. Our execution sucks, |
8 |
> though. We also have projects working against each other (or, at least, |
9 |
> not in step with each other) |
10 |
|
11 |
Cite examples. |
12 |
|
13 |
> > The Gentoo Installer is an interesting project, not only for the |
14 |
> > graphical frontend, but for the Distro-sponsored Network installer that |
15 |
> > is being worked on. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I agree, but it's been "in development" for...I dunno..almost two years now |
18 |
> I think and it's still not released. I'm not slamming the -installer team |
19 |
> -- I think they're a great bunch of guys, but it does point to our |
20 |
> inability to execute. |
21 |
|
22 |
Really? I seem to remember a nice news story with 2005.1's release |
23 |
about an Installer LiveCD for x86. I also remember one for 2005.1-r1 |
24 |
for both x86 and amd64. For 2006.0, the Installer will be considered |
25 |
the default method for installing Gentoo on x86, and possibly even amd64 |
26 |
(if they want). I also was planning on producing at least one more |
27 |
LiveCD for another architecture for 2006.0... |
28 |
|
29 |
> > The Portage project has some cool stuff coming up. I realize that the |
30 |
> > 2.X codebase scares a lot of people away due to it's nature but recently |
31 |
> > there has been a lot more active development in features and planning. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Again, lots of talk, some code, but nothing we can point to and say, "look! |
34 |
> see that? We did that!!" and be proud of it. |
35 |
|
36 |
Funny. I can. --newuse. That alone has been one of the best features |
37 |
in portage in a long, long time. I find it absolutely amazing, as |
38 |
before it was a nightmare to maintain Gentoo. Of course, this |
39 |
"nightmare" was during your glory period of innovation. |
40 |
|
41 |
> > You can't really say "well your interest is useless so work on something |
42 |
> > else instead" and expect them to comply. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> No, but you can say, "this is the direction we've decided to go in. We'd |
45 |
> love to have you as part of the team, but if you want to go a different |
46 |
> direction, please take a copy of the source code, along with our blessings |
47 |
> and we wish you the best of luck." |
48 |
|
49 |
Sounds like you'd rather take Gentoo back a few years to the days before |
50 |
Hardened/Embedded/Alt. I guess we really should just be "Gentoo Linux" |
51 |
and ignore all of the progress and work that has been made in all of |
52 |
these other areas simply because it doesn't fit with your goals. I'd |
53 |
like to also propose that we drop support for sparc, mips, sh, m68k, |
54 |
s390, arm, and alpha, since they detract from our main goals of |
55 |
providing amd64/ppc/x86 releases. After all, who really uses those |
56 |
"other" arches anyway but a bunch of guys that never have good ideas or |
57 |
improve quality of the distribution as a whole and constantly distract |
58 |
us away from getting anything constructive done? |
59 |
|
60 |
> It's great to tinker and experiment with new things, but at some point, |
61 |
> those tinkerings will have interdependencies on other parts of the project. |
62 |
|
63 |
So what? |
64 |
|
65 |
> People will need/want features added to <foo> in order for them to be able |
66 |
> to continue. If those features don't adhere to the overall direction that |
67 |
> has been chosen for the project, then they're taking time and resources |
68 |
> away from that direction, regardless of who does the actual coding. |
69 |
|
70 |
So if I were to add some great new whiz-bang feature to portage that |
71 |
would only be used in building releases for Hardened, it is a waste of |
72 |
time even if I do all of the coding myself simply because that might not |
73 |
be the overall direction where we are heading? |
74 |
|
75 |
Dude, pass the pipe. I want some of what you're smoking. |
76 |
|
77 |
-- |
78 |
Chris Gianelloni |
79 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
80 |
x86 Architecture Team |
81 |
Games - Developer |
82 |
Gentoo Linux |
83 |
|
84 |
-- |
85 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |