Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:46:08
Message-Id: 4288EA77.2030104@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion by Henrik Brix Andersen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
5 > The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
6 > for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
7 > orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
8 > allowed by portage.
9 >
10 > I can't go with just orinoco-0.15_pre20050516.ebuild as _rcX is
11 > considered newer than _preY.
12
13 How about rc2_p20050516?
14 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
15 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
16
17 iD8DBQFCiOp3XVaO67S1rtsRAok8AKD3dkxsKsP+zr4F72UgRcEkGzvhYwCfVwB0
18 KxOD3PruBa+zU5McrlWD5F8=
19 =7q8G
20 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>