Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:25:33
Message-Id: 20050516232528.GA8290@lion.gg3.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion by Donnie Berkholz
1 maillog: 16/05/2005-11:46:15(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types
2 > Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
3 > > The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
4 > > for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
5 > > orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
6 > > allowed by portage.
7 > >
8 > > I can't go with just orinoco-0.15_pre20050516.ebuild as _rcX is
9 > > considered newer than _preY.
10 >
11 > How about rc2_p20050516?
12
13 For a moment I thought that the above may actually be valid... Good
14 thing it's not. I would have been confused.
15
16 --
17 | Georgi Georgiev | Oh, well, of course, everything looks bad |
18 | chutz@×××.net | if you remember it. -- Homer Simpson El |
19 | +81(90)2877-8845 | Viaje Misterioso de Nuestro Homer |

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>