Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:22:33
Message-Id: 4289AAE7.4040208@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion by Georgi Georgiev
1 Georgi Georgiev wrote:
2 > maillog: 16/05/2005-11:46:15(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types
3 >
4 >>Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
5 >>
6 >>>The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
7 >>>for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
8 >>>orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
9 >>>allowed by portage.
10 >>>
11 >>>I can't go with just orinoco-0.15_pre20050516.ebuild as _rcX is
12 >>>considered newer than _preY.
13 >>
14 >>How about rc2_p20050516?
15 >
16 >
17 > For a moment I thought that the above may actually be valid... Good
18 > thing it's not. I would have been confused.
19 >
20
21 Well, it's valid with portage-2.1, but not 2.0.
22
23 Marius
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>