| 1 |
* Ian Stakenvicius schrieb am 07.09.15 um 16:41 Uhr: |
| 2 |
> Why not just: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> DEPEND=" |
| 5 |
> dev-python/paramiko |
| 6 |
> !~dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 |
| 7 |
> " |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Depend on the package but block the individual atom(s) that don't work? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I like it. At least with the current possibilities. I was not aware that |
| 12 |
"!~" is already a valid blocker. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Given that there will be *very few* valid use cases for this type of |
| 17 |
> syntax I don't know if it's such a good idea to add it. I expect |
| 18 |
> adding this new syntax would be more likely to cause issues via |
| 19 |
> improper usage than it would add a benefit or fill any massively |
| 20 |
> pressing need... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Depending on how it is implemented, I think it would be intuitive to |
| 23 |
use. I'd find having "=" vs. "!=" and "~" vs. "!~" straight forward. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
You are of cource right that there is no "massively pressing need" atm. |
| 26 |
But that was not always a reason for a new feature ;) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-Marc |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 |
| 32 |
3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 |
Archives