1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 15:53 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 03:08:53PM CDT] |
3 |
> > I'd like to see the following items added: |
4 |
> > glep 15: script repository (working prototype has existed for some time) |
5 |
> I'm not quite sure what you're adding. GLEP 15 was approved quite some |
6 |
> time ago. "All" that remains is to finish up the implementation. |
7 |
or rather move it from gentooexperimental.org to "official" gentoo infrastructure (?) |
8 |
|
9 |
> > QA: Preventing tree breakage and improving quality |
10 |
> > GLEP31 (The UTF-8 Glep) would be dependant on a QA team that can |
11 |
> > actually fix things and should be resurrected from its frozen state. |
12 |
> Huh? Why should Mr_Bones_ need to go around fixing broken encodings? |
13 |
> He just has to break the legs of the offending devs.... |
14 |
Would be better if |
15 |
(1) it wasn't Mr_Bones alone and |
16 |
(2) there was an agreed on policy so that (if needed) repeat offenders |
17 |
can be sanctioned |
18 |
(e.g. by flipping their commit bit) |
19 |
that of course needs some backing from the general dev population and |
20 |
devrel, also the policies should be properly defined so that noone can |
21 |
weasel out by invoking "it's always been like this" |
22 |
|
23 |
I hope I'm not alone in my quest for higher QA standards :-) |
24 |
|
25 |
wkr, |
26 |
Patrick |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move |