| 1 |
Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 04:29:45PM CDT] |
| 2 |
> > I'm not quite sure what you're adding. GLEP 15 was approved quite some |
| 3 |
> > time ago. "All" that remains is to finish up the implementation. |
| 4 |
> or rather move it from gentooexperimental.org to "official" gentoo |
| 5 |
> infrastructure (?) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Ah, I see. To the best of my knowledge that just needs to be worked out |
| 8 |
w/ the GLEP 15 people and infra. I dropped into -infra and they said |
| 9 |
that there's space for it, but that bug # 98282 lists a couple of |
| 10 |
contentious points. (Also, the gentooexperimental scripts "about" page |
| 11 |
seems to suggest that their framework differs from the "official" |
| 12 |
version.) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > Huh? Why should Mr_Bones_ need to go around fixing broken encodings? |
| 15 |
> > He just has to break the legs of the offending devs.... |
| 16 |
> Would be better if |
| 17 |
> (1) it wasn't Mr_Bones alone and |
| 18 |
> (2) there was an agreed on policy so that (if needed) repeat offenders |
| 19 |
> can be sanctioned |
| 20 |
> (e.g. by flipping their commit bit) |
| 21 |
> that of course needs some backing from the general dev population and |
| 22 |
> devrel, also the policies should be properly defined so that noone can |
| 23 |
> weasel out by invoking "it's always been like this" |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Oh, of course. I just don't agree that all GLEPs that involve QA should be |
| 26 |
put on hold until we improve QA, however. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-g2boojum- |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 31 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 32 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 33 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 34 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives