| 1 |
Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 04:29:45PM CDT] |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>>I'm not quite sure what you're adding. GLEP 15 was approved quite some |
| 5 |
>>>time ago. "All" that remains is to finish up the implementation. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>or rather move it from gentooexperimental.org to "official" gentoo |
| 8 |
>>infrastructure (?) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Ah, I see. To the best of my knowledge that just needs to be worked out |
| 12 |
> w/ the GLEP 15 people and infra. I dropped into -infra and they said |
| 13 |
> that there's space for it, but that bug # 98282 lists a couple of |
| 14 |
> contentious points. (Also, the gentooexperimental scripts "about" page |
| 15 |
> seems to suggest that their framework differs from the "official" |
| 16 |
> version.) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
A correction, the bug# is 98272. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
This is correct. Last I knew port001 was working on a python based |
| 21 |
version of this. If this has changed, we need to know about. Also, |
| 22 |
before people go developing a new site that may potentially become an |
| 23 |
official site, I would like to require them to submit an implementation |
| 24 |
plan to the infra team via a bug or some other method. I don't want to |
| 25 |
end up supporting every framework out there just because its cool. If |
| 26 |
you're using something other than what we're currently using, I would |
| 27 |
like to see justification for using it beyond "its a call framework". |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Anyways, we have the space open for it, just haven't heard from port001 |
| 30 |
in a while about it. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 34 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
--- |
| 37 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 38 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
Archives