| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 31 Dec 2017, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 06:44:39PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
>> W dniu nie, 31.12.2017 o godzinie 14∶31 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Müller |
| 5 |
>> napisał: |
| 6 |
>> > -# that needs the epatch function from eutils.eclass won't work without the |
| 7 |
>> > +# that needs the epatch function from epatch.eclass won't work without the |
| 8 |
>> > # following line: |
| 9 |
>> > -inherit eutils |
| 10 |
>> > +#inherit epatch |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Well, given that it's EAPI 6 and we do not want to encourage people |
| 13 |
>> to use epatch there, I would prefer if we replaced that example |
| 14 |
>> with something else. But it's just a wishful thinking here. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> +1, but I'm not going to suggest what to replace it with. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
How about one of these examples: |
| 19 |
"eautoreconf function from autotools.eclass" |
| 20 |
"tc-getCC function from toolchain-funcs.eclass" |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ulrich |
Archives