1 |
On 12/18/13 11:50 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 17:37:56 CEST, "C. Bergström" wrote: |
3 |
>> From the perspective of a compiler vendor - I must ask why not? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> There is code out there which builds fine under C++98, but fails to |
6 |
> build when C++11 is enabled (as but one exmaple, have a look at [1]). |
7 |
If moving to C++11 - Isn't that considered just part of the work along |
8 |
the path? There's some clang tools to help with the migration, but I |
9 |
don't think anyone expects it to be zero work. The flag is just a way to |
10 |
a) enable building programs that can be built with c++11 b) flush out |
11 |
the culprits in the cases it can't be. If (b) is a bug - how else to |
12 |
find it easily? |