| 1 |
Alin Nastac wrote: |
| 2 |
> Philip Webb wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> It is debatable whether users whose systems are already working properly |
| 5 |
>> should be expected to read sections of the Handbook |
| 6 |
>> merely in order to accommodate a newly-introduced form of configuration |
| 7 |
>> or whether some brief note in the emerge output or in GWN |
| 8 |
>> would be a better way of alerting them to such changes, |
| 9 |
>> but we all have other things to do today & I won't take it further. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> Well, I could bail out in pkg_setup if /etc/init.d/rp-pppoe script still |
| 14 |
> exist. However, these kind of discussions shouldn't be here, but in bugzie. |
| 15 |
> Btw, the change was made 9+ months ago: |
| 16 |
> ... |
| 17 |
> 21 Jun 2005; Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o> -files/rp-pppoe.rc, |
| 18 |
> rp-pppoe-3.5-r11.ebuild: |
| 19 |
> Remove the rp-pppoe init script. The new way of using rp-pppoe is through |
| 20 |
> adsl net module of the baselayout-1.11.12-r4. |
| 21 |
> ... |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
And that change was duly noted and acted upon by almost everyone. We had |
| 25 |
several threads in the forums plus the einfo warnings. Most people made |
| 26 |
the transition without any problems. Good work on the adsl mrness, it |
| 27 |
works so much better than rp-pppoe now, thanks! |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
--curtis119 |
Archives