1 |
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 23:19 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:43:20 +0100 Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> | > The only reason certain arch teams are considered a bottleneck is |
5 |
> | > because they do real testing. As opposed to x86 or ppc, where |
6 |
> | > packages which won't even unpack get marked stable... |
7 |
> | |
8 |
> | You can't help yourself, can you? You have to have a pop at |
9 |
> | someone :( |
10 |
> |
11 |
> It's the truth, it's a problem and it needs fixing. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
And I am sure everybody know why it was not a problem before, but is |
15 |
now. You have you wish, we are working on it, and you had your chance |
16 |
at trolling, but for the love of all, stop it if its not something |
17 |
constructive that needs adding. |
18 |
|
19 |
> | It's impossible for an arch team to keep pace with the rate of change |
20 |
> | in the tree and do adequate testing too. No arch team is currently |
21 |
> | big enough. Arch teams are always going to lag behind what package |
22 |
> | maintainers do. It's a simple numbers game. |
23 |
> | |
24 |
> | There are only two arch teams with 20 or more members (amd64 and ppc), |
25 |
> | as of 22:30 BST today. They have to deal with the output of approx |
26 |
> | 155 herds, plus countless changes that don't go through herds in the |
27 |
> | first place. The numbers speak for themselves. Arch teams are |
28 |
> | bottlenecks. Until the numbers change, that won't change. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> You want numbers? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> A total of 31 ebuilds seems outdated on sparc |
33 |
> A total of 72 ebuilds seems outdated on x86 |
34 |
> |
35 |
> A total of 3634 packages are keyworded on sparc |
36 |
> A total of 7793 packages are keyworded on x86 |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Real numbers. Not guesswork based upon misconceptions. |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
Which is about two times more outdated packages on x86 than sparc, and |
42 |
with the amount keyworded on x86 being about twice that of sparc, it |
43 |
really seems to me like the ratio is fairly the same, and both are in |
44 |
the same boat with regards to whatever the numbers had to prove? |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
Martin Schlemmer |