| 1 |
On 09:55 Mon 13 Jun, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 10/06/16 17:32, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On 10/06/16 03:53 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> ... Their repositories would likely be amalgamations of our |
| 8 |
> >> curated and reviewed repositories ... |
| 9 |
> > Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? When I read it, it |
| 10 |
> > sounds like you're saying people will copy ebuilds/packages from |
| 11 |
> > the core/reviewed repositories into their own, just to have them |
| 12 |
> > to satisfy deps or whatever.. |
| 13 |
> I expect that at least80% of users will just use the standard set of |
| 14 |
> repositories (defined by us), and never venture outside of them. The |
| 15 |
> other 20% however might be more adventurous, and might end up |
| 16 |
> contributing back ebuilds. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
This is how overlays work right now. What are suggesting to change? |
Archives