| 1 |
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 15:53:07 -0500 Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| I'm still thinking about the concept of a "maint" option. This |
| 4 |
| question I can answer, however. It's not unheard of for a package |
| 5 |
| with a lot of dependencies to be marked stable when one of the |
| 6 |
| dependencies has not yet been so marked. In that sort of |
| 7 |
| tree-breaking case, the arch teams actually do know better, since |
| 8 |
| they maintain ``arch`` systems (or chroots) for testing. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Anyone doing that needs to have their commit access revoked. repoman has |
| 11 |
checked for this properly for about eighteen months now. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
| 15 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 16 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives