| 1 |
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 02:04 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > - in the case of developers who do not wish to follow accepted |
| 4 |
> > policies/guidelines/etc even after being enlightened, devrel is notified |
| 5 |
> > and takes appropriate corrective action |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> - in the case of a need to take appropriate corrective action, devrel |
| 8 |
> gets tied up in investigative and judgment subcommittees that take so |
| 9 |
> long to get anything done, by the time they finally manage to agree on |
| 10 |
> it (twice), the issue has already been resolved. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
this side note is unrelated to the point being made and really belongs in the |
| 13 |
previous discussions on the devrel list |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
besides, is this a bad thing ? i'd prefer to have devs settle crap themselves |
| 16 |
than ever contacting devrel :P |
| 17 |
-mike |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives