Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:48:33
Message-Id: 432739E2.1070108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > this side note is unrelated to the point being made and really belongs in the
3 > previous discussions on the devrel list
4 >
5 > besides, is this a bad thing ? i'd prefer to have devs settle crap themselves
6 > than ever contacting devrel :P
7
8 It's very relevant, because it supports the idea of QA taking care of
9 technical issues on its own. QA can work faster since it's less objected
10 do and doesn't need endless committees and documentation -- the
11 documentation is the broken code.
12
13 Thanks,
14 Donnie
15 --
16 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies