| 1 |
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 04:43 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > this side note is unrelated to the point being made and really belongs in |
| 4 |
> > the previous discussions on the devrel list |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > besides, is this a bad thing ? i'd prefer to have devs settle crap |
| 7 |
> > themselves than ever contacting devrel :P |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> It's very relevant, because it supports the idea of QA taking care of |
| 10 |
> technical issues on its own. QA can work faster since it's less objected |
| 11 |
> do and doesn't need endless committees and documentation -- the |
| 12 |
> documentation is the broken code. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
QA team does not care at all about inner workings of devrel |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
QA team identifies a misbehaving dev who refuses to change and then hands off |
| 17 |
the name/relevant data to devrel ... QA team then is pretty much done with |
| 18 |
the issue and the rest is up to devrel to resolve |
| 19 |
-mike |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives