Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass | ||
| Date: | Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:47:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080219134729.32659d5a@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass by Doug Klima |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:44:43 -0500 |
| 2 | Doug Klima <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > A better statement on your part would have been "We need to ensure |
| 4 | > compatibility for the greatest amount of users and requiring users to |
| 5 | > have a version of Portage released after January 4th when it's only |
| 6 | > the middle of February is not going to ensure the greatest |
| 7 | > compatibility. The previous policy was always 6 months between breaks |
| 8 | > like this." You're free to reword the above to however you see fit. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | You mean "the change should of course have been an EAPI bump". |
| 11 | |
| 12 | hth, |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass | Doug Klima <cardoe@g.o> |