| 1 |
On 08/08/2013 04:47 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/07/2013 09:55 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:32:39AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> AFAIK, the status is "unimplemented, and nobody's working on it". |
| 5 |
>> No, I did post implementation patches for much of it back when the GLEPs |
| 6 |
>> were in process. The overwhelming message from other devs at the time |
| 7 |
>> was that it should happen at the same time or shortly after the Git |
| 8 |
>> migration, and that in the short-term, if you needed that security, you |
| 9 |
>> should be using the signed portage snapshot tarballs. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> So the git migration IS actually a blocker? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
No, there's many things that need to be done that are unrelated to the |
| 15 |
VCS used. It's just chasing a white unicorn that has been just around |
| 16 |
the next corner for the last .... err .... years |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Do we really expect it to happen? Should we wait? Why? |
| 19 |
Orthogonal problems shouldn't be coupled |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I'd say let's push for it. I am willing to do a lot of testing. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
Good plan. I hope I find some time to figure out a roadmap so we have an |
| 25 |
idea what needs to be done - or someone else might just want to read |
| 26 |
through some old threads and do the same. |
Archives