Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Seifert <soap@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 19:11:09
Message-Id: 1501355459.7122.3.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? by Mart Raudsepp
1 On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 19:41 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
2 > > why take away the stable choice?
3 >
4 > I think it is rather clear that stable keywords aren't going anywhere
5 > for architectures like amd64. I suggest we drop all of the subthreads
6 > on this topic and get back to other interesting thoughts (which may
7 > include dropping stable for some other arches of course; I mean doing
8 > it for all doesn't deserve e-mails imo).
9 >
10 >
11 > Mart
12 >
13
14 I demand you stop asking for dropping stable for "some other arches",
15 otherwise I might have to stop arch testing on ppc and sparc.